Credit Cards · August 2026
Petal states its card rates while its application page renders sparse
An AI agent ran five ordinary credit cards tasks on the public pages of Petal and scored what each page delivered.
Run 6 August 2026 · five tasks · public pages, logged out · Fintech
72/100
Mystery Agent score
Credit Cards · rank 15 of 25
Purchase APR
90Served as text
Card comparison
90Served as text
Pricing and terms
88Served as PDF
Welcome offer
78Partly served
Application page
15Arrives after scripts
Summary
- Petal publishes complete APR, fee, and rewards-rate tables directly in the page text for every card in its lineup.
- An automated reader found five separate Cardholder Agreement PDFs linked from one legal-resources page, each carrying a dated APR and fee table.
- The home page, both card pages, and the legal-resources hub leave the question of a welcome bonus for new cardholders unaddressed.
Task by task
Each task is scored out of 100 on completion, answer quality and how directly the answer was reached. Each note describes what the page delivered, with a link to the page the answer was found on.
Task 01Purchase APRServed as text90 out of 100
The home page states a variable APR range of 28.24% to 33.24%, while the Petal 2 card page narrows that to 28.24% to 30.24%, a figure confirmed word for word in the card's Cardholder Agreement PDF.
Task 02Card comparisonServed as text90 out of 100
Petal 1 offers a $0 annual fee, 1% to 10% cash back at select merchants, and a 28.24% to 33.24% APR, while Petal 2 offers $0 fees and a narrower 28.24% to 30.24% APR.
Task 03Pricing and termsServed as PDF88 out of 100
The Petal 2 Cardholder Agreement PDF, linked from the legal-resources page, opens with a full Schumer box: purchase APR 28.24% to 30.24%, a $0 annual membership fee, and $0 late and returned payment fees, dated January 5, 2026.
Task 04Welcome offerPartly served78 out of 100
The home page, both Petal 1 and Petal 2 product pages, the legal-resources hub, and the support center each center on ongoing cash back and fee avoidance, without naming a one-time welcome bonus in either direction.
Task 05Application pageArrives after scripts15 out of 100
A plain fetch of the registration link returned 8,083 bytes of HTML that strip down to 15 characters of visible text, 'Apply for Petal,' with zero input and zero form elements in the response.
Variable APR range from 28.24% to 33.24%. Cards issued by WebBank.
The application page
What the account opening page states to a reader that runs no scripts.
8,083Bytes delivered
15Characters of visible text
0Form fields in the first response
After scripts runWhat an applicant needs
Strengths and opportunities
What is working
- Petal publishes full APR, fee, and rewards-rate tables directly in page HTML for every card in its lineup (Petal 1, Petal 1 Rise, Petal 2), so an agent reads the numbers without opening a PDF or logging in.
- Petal makes five separate Schumer-box style Cardholder Agreement PDFs openly linked from a single legal-resources hub, each with a dated APR, fee table, and the exact prime-rate margin math behind the variable rate.
- Every rate disclosure carries an explicit as-of date (for example 'accurate as of 1/5/2026'), which is a small but real trust signal for an agent trying to judge how current a number is.
Opportunities
- No page checked (home, both card pages, legal resources, or the support site) mentions a welcome offer or sign-up bonus in either direction. A one-line statement confirming Petal has no such bonus, or naming cash back as the stated alternative, would turn a silent gap into a delivered answer.
- The application application page at registration.petalcard.com serves a nearly empty document: 15 characters of visible text and zero input fields in the raw response, because the entire form is a client-side JavaScript app. Serving a short static summary of required information (SSN, income, identity verification) ahead of the JS bundle would let an agent read the application page directly, the way the marketing pages already disclose eligibility language.
- /llms.txt resolves to the generic 'Not Found' HTML page instead of a proper 404 or a real file. Cleaning up that response would stop agent tooling from mistaking a broken path for a delivered signal.
Access
Every page the agent requested was delivered on the first attempt. Publishing an llms.txt file would give agent traffic a documented entry point.
Back to the credit cards leaderboard · Read the report · How the study works
